Skip to main content

Eco-Feminism: An Introduction



Eco-Feminism: An Introduction
This week’s readings took us through various ideological formations and paradigms of the eco-feminism discourse of social movements, which seek to elicit women’s roles and active involvement, engagement and participation in the process of social change, political, economic and cultural reformulation and as well as transitioning from an unsustainable to a more sustainable and egalitarian societies and cultures. The authors claimed that women should not only be considered the benefactors of change, but that true change can never be achieved if women are not fully involved, engaged and act themselves the preparer and implementers of such change. Mellor (1997) added that, “true social change should promote a non-gendered egalitarian society rather than what other proponents of the feminist discourse are suggesting; that is, a power-to-women paradigm (p. 6).”
Mellor (1997) takes us through the lens of some of the earliest proponents of the ecofeminism discourse, which was first coined in 1974. She added “male dominance in the production sector and the subsequent control of women’s sexuality was associated with environmental damage as well as overpopulation due to the fact that women had no control over their sexuality, since they were subjected by their male counterparts (Mellor 1997). She also argues that in order to create substantial social and cultural changes of the prevailing gendered-biased, male dominated social, economic, political and cultural order there is a need for “a planet in the female-gender” (Mellor 1997). She added that modernity is a product of this current system; that is, the social order to progress and be “modernized” has been closely linked and associated with the ecological cost of progress and that this system is entirely dominated by the western perception of family, leadership, and economic progress which can be attributed and traced to the concept of the “patriarchal man” as the social driver for the modernity crisis and its adverse ecological damages.
She also added that the earliest formulation of ecofeminism perspectives in the United States was entirely based on two distinct and interrelated concepts; that is, the first focusing on the radical, cultural and spiritual feminism orientation, which is more focus on the natural disposition of women to the natural world, while the second premised on the social constructionist theoretical framework and radical political ideology, which basically involves and constitutes the eco-anarchism and social theoretical frameworks, such as, Marxism and socialism (Mellor 1997). She asserts that unlike other ecofeminist’s movements in other parts of the world, the development of ecofeminism in the United States was basically constructed and framed on the socialist political ideological framework and paradigm.   
While I was reading the materials for the week, I couldn’t but wonder in what way can the feminist movement progress in the midst of the contesting claims of the differences that underpin the conceptualization of a “universalized woman,” since the conception of difference of women in both the global “North” and “South”, “West” and the “Rest” is empirically different based on distinct cultures and ideologies. What considerations are being made to contest these claims? Is ecofeminism or feminism in general over romanticized? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ethics, Human Conduct and Values: Slavery’s Pleasant Homes

Ethics, Human Conduct and Values:
Slavery’s Pleasant Homes
Slavery’s Pleasant Homes told by L. M. Child is a sorrowful story that presents a clear picture of how racism, slavery, marriage, and classism as institutions were used by Frederic Dalcho to oppress and humiliate George, Rosa, Mars and Marion. The purpose of this paper is to discuss, investigate and analyze all the major elements in the story and how these elements can be linked to the various characters such as Frederic and George Dalcho, Mars, Marion and Rosa. This paper seeks to investigate who is morally culpable for perpetrating the worst thing that humanity has ever encounter. It is also my goal to recommend possible power structures that can be substituted for those  which existed in the story. I also attempt to address current sexist, racist and classist practices that are demonstrated in the United States and how these practices promote and encourage oppression, male supremacy, violence, and the exploitation of the pow…

Regenerative Agriculture through Drip Irrigation Systems, Three-Sisters Garden Model and Small-scale Animal Farming: A Reflection from the Past

Drip Irrigation installed about 30cm away from raised-beds at a height of 1m. Source: RESPECT Ghana
The world is presently experiencing major changes that have been largely linked to anthropogenic activities and these changes influence the climate systems, leads to variations in the Earth's climate systems. “Global Warming” is causing many devastating changes in the earth’s global climate systems which also have significant implications on landforms, biodiversity, water systems, and atmospheric system. There is a need to take drastic actions now, if our species is to survive throughout the next 25 years. In order to continue to survive as a species, there is a need for us to become more proactive both at the local, national, and international levels on how we use our energy sources for a more sustainable future. A future that not only define our species, but also take into careful account our neighbors the plants, animals, water, land, air, and all those microscopic living and non-l…

A Classical Theory Paper on The Movie "Brazil."

Source: URL: http://www.flickeringmyth.com/2013/02/the-terry-gilliam-retrospective-part-3.html

The Criterion Edition of the 1985 movie known as ‘Brazil’ detailed significant classical theoretical concepts of Max Weber. The paper discussed how specific scenes and dialogues in the movie are related to Weber’s view of the world from a theoretical perspective.


Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wh2b1eZFUM Weber (1864-1920) was a pessimistic classical theorist unlike Karl Marx (1818-1883) who was more optimistic about events occurring in society. He believes that society will gradually become difficult and there is nothing that we can do to fix it. His theory was based on two ultimate themes which are reflected in his entire theoretical thesis: firstly, “the emergence of capitalism as the dominant form of organization in the West and secondly, the relationship between ideas and actions” (McQuaid, summer 1 Lecture, 09). These two components of Weber’s theoretical works were reflective…