The
framing and conceptualization of sustainability in urban and suburban areas plan and design is an important aspect to consider when discussing sustainability. Rob Krueger and David Gibbs’ article on “‘Third Wave’
Sustainability? Smart Growth and Regional Development in the USA” (2008)-looks at
urban sustainability from the perspective of the “Smart Growth” discourse,
which defines urban growth and development as development that is “sustainably
aware,” holistic in nature, and that is “environmentally sensitive, economically
viable, community-oriented, and sustainable” (Ye et al., cited in Gibbs and
Krueger 2008, pg. 1266). They argued that this kind of growth focuses on
regional and urban development planning perspectives with the goal much more
similar to that of the compact urban planning perspective. Krueger and Gibbs
(2008) asserts that the sustainability science framework that is embedded within
the smart growth discourse has a contextualized economic and market-based
dimension. To this end, they argued that the smart growth discourse has political
and theoretical significance and benefits, which heavily relies on economic
mechanisms such as innovation, incentives, and disincentives (Gibbs and Krueger 2008). Gibbs
and Krueger (2008) asserts that even though there are different conceptualizations
and definitions of what smart growth is and how the concept is operationalized
at the urban, regional, and national levels among various stakeholders, there are certain principles that transcend throughout these
definitions and geopolitical boundaries. They also added that the concept of “Smart Growth” is constructed
on two guiding principles of development goals, which involves a tripartite component
of urban development planning (i.e. taking into account in its holistic form
the community, environment, and economy) as well as a regulatory reforms aspect,
which allows these themes to become functional and operational, without which
smart growth can not be achieved (Gibbs and Krueger 2008).
The article on “New Urbanism” by Karen F. Al-Hindi (2001) explored the new
urbanism discourse based on empirical research, which sought to answer some
pressing and compelling questions concerning for whom the new urbanism discourse is targeting
and where such developments are operating with focus on the United States. Al-Hindi
(2001) argued that even though the new urbanism discourse would benefit
everyone in the long-term as suggested by proponent of this thought; however,
in the short-term, it is designated to only benefit those who are design
professionals, developers, and those of the upper-class homebuyers’ regime. She
noted that the new urbanism sustainability framework is aligned with
and supported by several current political and social issues (Al-Hindi 2001). She
added that neo-traditional architectures of the 20th Century are
depiction of the classical lifestyles of those of the new urbanism school of
thought. Al-Hindi also touched on a very sensitive theme and discussion concerning the
exclusive and isolated lifestyles of new urbanists-a view that is perpetrated
by their belief to be associated with people of the same-mindset, engulfed in
gated residential buildings away from those they framed as the “others”
(Al-Hindi 2001). The plight to seek for and live by principle of a lifestyle
that promotes the local ecological values and environment is sometimes refer to
as “Smart Growth”-a term that has gradually developed overtime. Al-Hindi concluded her work that New Urbanism quickly diffused into the mainstream American society, because
it seems to present realistic and straight answers that are premised on the
built environment in relations to complex and unparalleled social issues that
are embedded in our society.
Works Cited
Al-Hindi, Karen F. (2001). “The
New Urbanism: Where and for Whom? Investigation of an Emergent Paradigm.” Urban
Geography, Vol. 22, 3, pg. 202-219.
Gibbs, D., Krueger, R.
(2008).“Third
Wave’ Sustainability? Smart Growth and Regional Development in the USA.” Regional Studies, 42:9,1263 — 1274.
Ye L., Mandpe S. and Meyer, P. (2005). “What
is Smart Growth – Really?” Journal of Planning Literature 19, 301–319.
Comments